Book
Review:
EXPLORERS
HOUSE:
National
Geographic
and the
World it
Made
by
Robert M.
Poole
New York: Penguin Books,
2004 358 p., illus.,
maps
ISBN
1-59420-032-7 |
|
|
The
world as seen by the
National Geographic
Any American born in the 20th century who
liked to read was bound to have been influenced by
the National Geographic, a wonderful publication
that brought good paper, fine color and
exceptional
photography to a mass audience. The contents
gave us a new lens on the world, taking us to places
that only a very few would ever
see.
Like so many venerable institutions,
the Geographic and its parent, the National
Geographic Society, had another side, and this portrait is by
an “insider” who had retired as the magazine’s
executive editor and was more than informed about the
issues leading to the demise of the “old” magazine in the1990s. Writes author Robert M. Poole: “they
(magazine and Society) were transformed from an
organization known for its paternalism, insularity and
endearing
idiosyncrasies . . . to a leaner, colder more
market oriented” publication that still retained wide
influence.
That influence even today is a legitimate
ten million member-circulation which its editors
maintain is read by at least three others, for every
subscriber and why that might be doubtful there is no
question that its distinctive yellow-bordered cover has made
it one of the classic “you-don’t-throw-it-out
journals” (which may be why estate auctioneers report it on
more inventories than any other common collectors
item).
So who started this modern
communications
survivor and top competitor in the entertainment,
news and cultural media wars of the 21st century? Go
back to Alexander Graham Bell, who didn’t just invent
the telephone, but with another blue-blood of the
time launched the National Geographic Society in
1888. That was Gardiner Hubbard and the person he
brought on as a young editor, Gilbert H.
Grosvenor, who
would direct the course of both institutions for much of
a
century.
The politics of the
Geographic offer a
fascinating
kaleidoscope of the past century and Poole does
not skimp on showing us the warts as well as
the achievements of the Society, the Grosvenor family
and their magazine. The photographic powerhouse
became a mixed media corporate presence, with expansion
to maps, globes, documentaries, television and
video.
Throughout, the distinctive yellow border
logo remains, and with it the image of family loyalty
and confidence that the NGS has
developed.
Poole does not back away from the downside
of the institutional racism that it accepted in its
coverage, and the internal racism that it practiced as did
most large non-profits— until the 70s. Perhaps
most embarrassing is the 1930s articles published
about Mussolini’s Italy and Hitler’s Germany (some of
them by Douglas Chandler, a Berlin-based
correspondent who was later convicted for treason as an
American radio
propagandist).
Those familiar with the North Pole
controversy may feel justified that the author accepts the
“Robert Peary myth” created by the
Grosvenors, and the
detail to which he discusses the conflict with Frederick
Cook. The author devotes an entire chapter to the
NGS investment in Peary and acknowledges that the
article by Wally Herbert in a centennial-year issue of
the magazine casts doubt on his discovery.
The
staunch support of Grosvenor was summarized by
Poole: “Having declared Peary a hero before any
proof was in, Bert (Gilbert H.
Grosvenor) stubbornly
ignored the gaps in the commander’s records, his
incredible
travelling times, his shoddy navigation, his lack
of witnesses and his seemingly odd behavior on his
return from the ice
cap.”
Citing NGS board member and Peary
antagonist General A. W. Greely as well as Herbert, the
author essentially categorizes Peary among the black eyes
of the Society. It might also be said that the Society
and its magazine expressed extreme pettiness for
over seven decades, not printing Cook’s name from the
time of his return until it appeared on a Society map in
1984 as a possible Polar contender. Poole also reminds
us that the controversy caused the firing of the
first president of the Society, Willis L. Moore, who
initially supported Cook “but as a meteorologist failed
to predict the consequences of the
Cook-Peary
storm.”
It could be said that the Geographic took off as
a mass-circulation publication after the marketing
by Grosvenor for his friend Robert E.
Peary, who is
still enshrined in the Explorers Hall of the Society,
where his tattered American flag and sled are there
for visitors to see. “There Peary was elevated as an
iconic figure” Poole writes, “above reproach or criticism,
if not above doubt, he was the first hero.”
-RWG
|